Posts
The Chess Masters' Secret to Creative Problem Solving (And Why Your Team Needs It)
Related Reading:
Three years ago, I watched a 12-year-old demolish a room full of business executives at a corporate chess tournament in Melbourne. Not with fancy strategy books or expensive coaching, but with something most boardrooms desperately lack: the ability to see problems from completely different angles.
That kid taught me more about creative problem solving in 47 minutes than I'd learnt in two decades of management consulting.
Here's the thing nobody tells you about creative problem solving: it's not about brainstorming sessions with sticky notes and motivational quotes plastered on whiteboard walls. Those workshops where Karen from HR makes everyone draw their feelings? Complete waste of time. Real creative problem solving is a discipline, like learning a musical instrument or perfecting your golf swing.
The chess connection isn't some trendy metaphor either. Grandmasters consistently demonstrate the exact cognitive flexibility that separates genuinely innovative thinkers from people who just rearrange existing solutions. They see patterns others miss, anticipate consequences three moves ahead, and – here's the crucial bit – they're comfortable sacrificing pieces that everyone else considers essential.
Why Most Problem Solving Training Misses the Mark
I've delivered problem solving workshops across Australia for the past 16 years, and honestly? About 78% of what gets taught is backwards.
Traditional approaches focus on logical, linear thinking. Step 1, step 2, step 3. Root cause analysis. Five whys. Fishbone diagrams. All useful tools, don't get me wrong, but they're like teaching someone to paint by only showing them how to stay inside the lines.
The breakthrough moments – the solutions that actually move the needle – come from cognitive rule-breaking. From asking questions that make your colleagues uncomfortable. From combining ideas that shouldn't work together but somehow do.
Take Airbnb. Classic example. The founders weren't accommodation experts or hospitality veterans. They were designers who got creative about paying rent. Instead of thinking "how do we compete with hotels," they asked "what if strangers' spare rooms could be better than hotels?" Completely different problem frame. Game over.
But here's where most Australian businesses get it wrong. We're brilliant at identifying problems – probably world-class complainers, if I'm being honest – but we immediately jump to solutions that look like everything we've tried before. New software for old processes. More meetings about having too many meetings. Hiring consultants to tell us what our own staff already know.
The Three Pillars of Genuine Creative Problem Solving
Pillar One: Perspective Multiplication
This isn't about "thinking outside the box" – that phrase should be banned from every workplace in Australia. It's about systematically viewing problems through completely different lenses.
I learned this from a mining engineer in Kalgoorlie who'd been solving equipment failures for 20 years. When a critical conveyor belt kept breaking down, instead of focusing on the mechanical components (obvious approach), he started thinking like the belt itself. What stresses was it experiencing? What would it say if it could complain? Sounds ridiculous, but within three days he'd identified a vibration pattern nobody else had noticed.
That's perspective multiplication. Customer perspective, competitor perspective, employee perspective, supplier perspective, even environmental perspective. Most problems look completely different when you shift your viewing angle by 45 degrees.
Pillar Two: Constraint Elimination
Here's an uncomfortable truth: most business problems exist because we've accepted artificial limitations that aren't actually real.
"We can't afford it." Says who? Maybe you can't afford traditional approaches, but what about completely different approaches that cost 80% less?
"Our customers would never accept that." Based on what evidence? When did you last actually ask them about alternatives they hadn't considered?
"Industry standards require..." Do they though? Or have industry standards just become comfortable excuses for not innovating?
I once worked with a Brisbane logistics company that was hemorrhaging money on fuel costs. Everyone assumed the problem was route optimisation – classic constraint thinking. Turned out the real breakthrough came from questioning why their trucks needed to return empty. Now they've got a side business delivering for three competitors on return journeys. Problem became profit centre.
Pillar Three: Solution Hybridisation
This is where creative problem solving training gets genuinely interesting. Instead of finding one perfect solution, you deliberately combine partial solutions from unrelated fields.
Netflix didn't invent video streaming or subscription services or recommendation algorithms. They hybridised existing concepts from completely different industries. Video rental + magazine subscriptions + Amazon's recommendation engine = streaming revolution.
Most Australian SMEs miss this completely. They're looking for the silver bullet solution when they should be building hybrid approaches that leverage multiple smaller innovations.
The Implementation Reality Check
Let me be brutally honest here. Creative problem solving sounds fantastic in theory, but implementing it in most Australian workplaces is like teaching synchronized swimming to a room full of accountants.
The biggest barrier isn't lack of creativity. It's organisational anxiety about looking stupid.
I've seen brilliant solutions shot down in meetings because they seemed "too different" or "not how we do things here." I've watched managers nod enthusiastically during workshops then return to exactly the same decision-making patterns they've used for years.
This is where leadership becomes crucial. Not the motivational poster version of leadership, but the version that actively protects and rewards cognitive risk-taking. The version that celebrates magnificent failures as much as conventional successes.
Why Australian Businesses Need This More Than Ever
Here's something that might surprise you: Australian businesses are actually pretty good at creative problem solving. We just don't recognise it or systematise it.
Think about how we've adapted during the pandemic. Remote work solutions that seemed impossible in February 2020 became standard practice by April. Restaurants became delivery operations overnight. Consultants started running workshops via Zoom. Pure creative problem solving, driven by necessity.
The issue is we treat this adaptability as crisis management rather than core business capability. We wait until we're forced to innovate instead of making innovation our default response to challenges.
That's backwards thinking. In a global economy where artificial intelligence is automating routine solutions, creative problem solving isn't a nice-to-have skill. It's the only sustainable competitive advantage left.
The Chess Master's Final Move
Remember that 12-year-old chess player? After watching him work through complex positions, I realised something that completely changed how I approach business challenges.
He wasn't trying to find the perfect move. He was looking for moves that created new possibilities his opponents hadn't considered. Moves that changed the entire nature of the game.
That's creative problem solving. Not finding perfect solutions to existing problems, but reframing problems so completely that the solutions become obvious.
Most businesses are playing checkers while their challenges require chess-level thinking. The good news? Unlike chess, business problem solving doesn't require genius-level talent. It just requires discipline, curiosity, and the courage to look stupid while you're learning.
The better news? Australian businesses are naturally good at this once they stop getting in their own way.
Start small. Pick one recurring problem this week and ask yourself: what would this look like if I were seeing it for the first time? What would someone from a completely different industry do? What assumptions am I making that might not be true?
Then prepare to be surprised by what you discover.
Sometimes the best solutions are hiding in plain sight, waiting for someone brave enough to see them differently.